An Opportunity To Participate
The Collegiate Learning Assessment (CLA) is an innovative approach to assessing your institution’s contribution to student learning developed by CAE with the RAND Corporation. Our measures are designed to simulate complex, ambiguous situations that every successful college graduate may one day face. Life is not like a multiple choice test, with four or five simple choices for every problem. So we ask students to analyze complex material and provide written responses. The CLA measures are uniquely designed to test for reasoning and communications skills that most agree should be one outcome of a college education.
Most CLA participants assess their institution cross-sectionally, testing a sample of first year students in the fall and a sample of seniors in the spring. You receive two reports, the first after fall testing that looks at how your entering class compares to other CLA participants (adjusted for SAT or ACT scores). Then after testing of seniors in the spring, you receive a full Institutional Report that evaluates your school's value-added on a comparative basis. Testing every year allows you to measure for effects of changes in curriculum or pedagogy.
For additional information about the assessment, please review the CLA Brochure. We also encourage you to review an Annotated Sample Institutional Report, which presents excerpts of a sample institutional report and accompanying explanations. If you’d like to review a list of institutions that are currently participating in the assessment, please click here. Finally, we welcome your visit to www.claintheclassroom.org, where you can learn more about the latest initiative of the CLA. Whereas participation in the institutional CLA provides a campus with information about the overall performance of students at a college or university, CLA in the Classroom allows a campus to begin to dig deeper and better understand its overall results.
Performance-based assessments are anchored in a number of psychometric assumptions different from those employed by common multiple-choice exams. As such, initiatives like the Collegiate Learning Assessment (CLA) represent a paradigm shift, the technical underpinnings of which remain unfamiliar to many faculty and institutional researchers. Please refer to the CLA Technical FAQs for more information about the development, scoring, and reliability of CLA tasks, as well as other frequently asked questions.
For CLA pricing information, please contact Chris Jackson by calling 212.217.0845 or emailing cjackson@cae.org
Institutions investigating participation in the Voluntary System of Accountability (VSA) are encouraged to download the CLA VSA Fact Sheet.
To sign up for the next academic year or be placed on our mailing list, contact CLA. Or sign up for a free web conference to learn more. |
About Collegiate Learning Assessment
The CLA begins with conceptions of collegiate quality that are based on improvements in student learning, with three key elements serving as the project’s foundation: the institution, value added, and campus comparisons.
Institution The CLA uses the institution (rather than the individual student) as the primary unit of analysis. This means that the focus is on how the institution as a whole contributes to student development.
Therefore, the CLA does not present another high-stakes test for individual students, but rather it aggregates the information to better understand the institution’s role in promoting learning.
Value Added The CLA focuses on the value added provided by colleges and universities. When institutional quality is based solely on the students’ scores on entrance examinations,
there is no way to know what was learned after they matriculated; again, when student ability is only measured upon graduation, there is no way to determine the students’ relative growth without knowing their
starting point. It is only by comparing what students know when they start college with what they know when they finish that it is possible to assess the learning that actually occurred while in college.
Comparisons This approach also allows for inter-institutional comparisons of overall value added. CLA results can be combined with institutional data to determine factors that promote student learning and growth. |
About the CLA Measures
The CLA focuses on a set of common areas that comprise what is central to most
notions of collegiate education. These areas are: |
| • critical thinking • analytic reasoning • written communication • problem solving |
The CLA combines two types of testing instruments:
Performance Tasks Students must complete a “real-life” activity (such as preparing
a memo or policy recommendation) by using a series of documents that
must be reviewed and evaluated. Completion of these instruments does not require
the recall of particular facts or formulas; instead, the measures assess the
demonstrated ability to interpret, analyze and synthesize information.
Analytic Writing Tasks Evaluate students’ ability to articulate complex ideas, examine
claims and evidence, support ideas with relevant reasons and examples, sustain a coherent discussion, and use standard written English. |
| Administration |
Results |
Each academic year, a sample of 100 freshmen and 100 seniors are assessed. Total testing time for each group is only 90 minutes.
In order to make the results for your campus useful, each participating campus will:
• Identify an appropriate sample of students
• Recruit the students (materials including recruitment suggestions will be provided by CAE; some campuses have found it beneficial to
provide participating students with a small honorarium, but other incentives also work at other institutions)
• Proctor the test-taking in a computer lab with Internet access (no special software is needed)
• Provide CAE with registrar data (including SAT or ACT scores) |
CLA Institutional Report – Campuses receive two reports: an interim report in mid-winter after testing of freshmen that provides an insight into your incoming class, and the final value-added report during the summer after testing of seniors.
CLA Student-Level Results – At the conclusion of each testing cycle, students receive their scores, which compare their performance to other students at their institution as well as to students at all CLA institutions testing in that term. Student-level CLA results are also provided to institutions to link with other data sources (e.g., course-taking patterns, grades, portfolio assessments, student satisfaction and engagement, major-specific tests, etc.).
CLA PowerPoint Presentation – Participating institutions receive a PowerPoint presentation along with their institutional report to help them communicate CLA results and the CLA approach to campus constituencies.
|
| Testimonials |
"Studies that measure the value added of college are the gold standard of higher education
assessment. The CLA is taking a most valuable step in the right direction."
Dr. Ernest Pascarella
Mary Louise Petersen Professor of Higher Education, University of Iowa
"With the mission of doubling the rate of Latinos earning their college degrees, the Hispanic Scholarship Fund (HSF) is committed to showing
the benefits of investing in the higher education of our Hispanic community. CAE continues to provide us with innovative research that develops direct measures of student learning."
Sara Martinez Tucker
Former President, Hispanic Scholarship Fund
"I believe the CLA initiative will be important to Johnson & Johnson. As a supporter of numerous institutions of higher education, we are interested
in this critical aspect of higher education reform."
Russell C. Deyo
Vice President, General Counsel, Johnson & Johnson |
"Evidence-based reasoning is one of the most important outcomes of a good liberal education.
By focusing on students’ analytical, integrative and communication abilities, the CLA will help campuses tie their assessment programs to
intellectual gains that have lasting value – both for students and for a knowledge– intensive society."
Dr. Carol Geary Schneider
President, Association of American Colleges and Universities
"Deans and provosts will embrace the additional information the CLA instruments provide, which when combined with existing institutional data,
can be used to determine which academic program areas should especially be encouraged to improve."
Dr. Roger Benjamin
President, Council for Aid to Education |
| Major Project Funders |
Carnegie Corporation of New York
Ford Foundation
Christian A. Johnson Endeavor Foundation
William and Flora Hewlett Foundation
Lumina Foundation
Teagle Foundation
The Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation
The Charles Engelhard Foundation
|
|
|
|